this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3622 readers
193 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Australian Senate, last sitting of the year. No idea when the Social Media Ban debate is kicking off.

If anyone's keen, feel free to give a live run-down of anything interesting in this thread.

(sorry about all the edits, just trying to get a decent thumbnail: elevated photo of the Australian Senate)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a wild overstep peddled in the name of "think of the children!!"

As any 12 year old with a porno mag will tell you, kids will get around this without even blinking. And the fun fact is that I, a grown arse adult three times their "acceptable" age to fuck around with the dangerous social media will coincidentally be asked to prove my age, full name, address to any comment I may make online and boy oh boy wait until I say something that disagrees with the obsidian order.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This comment right here. Not a fan of this bill at all and may potentially leave any platform that demands this information and/or ‘digital id’.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Moving countries here. just gonna post on this instance for nostalgia

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For real? Hyperbole? Or vpn joke

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not OP, but this garbage solidified my decision that I wish to move countries sometime soon. I think the EU's done a good job at regulating corporations while also not making such over the top decisions, and generally respecting democratic processes when they do make heavy handed decisions

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If I had better earning potential I probably would have absconded to Europe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

That's a large part of why I'm planning on continuing my studies eventually. As soon as the opportunity to move comes up,.I'm out of here

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wasn’t the digital ID addressed in the debate? It seems the main refutations are “it won’t fix everything immediately” and “digital ID will be enforced for everyone”. The only valid complaints I’ve heard are about digital ID which is only one of the way the government will require these companies to verify if I’ve understood the debate. I think “a small portion will work around it” is a weak excuse to avoid dealing what has been a big problem practically since the inception of social media.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Misinformation and snake oil salesmen have been issues since we invented society. This is the new iteration of it. Decrying it as the new biggest bad no one has ever seen before that must be slain is an absolute copout.

'They will get around it' - how is that a weak argument? I can guarantee you it will not be a small portion. The entire purported point of this is to 'protect' children from being exposed. If they're not protected whats the point? Why do this? To make yourself feel better and performative? That's the same fuckin' cancer in a new hat

As others have pointed out, the issue is media literacy, a blanket ban won't resolve that. And what good will unleashing a bunch of uneducated and unexposed sixteen year olds on reddit do anyway? We'll still have the same damned issue, only with older people. Hell, my in laws got sucked into the conspiracy cooker shit and they're hitting 70.

SM is attractive as it's a wider society to play in. The bad faith actors attract and prey on people who are receptive due to issues outside of SM, actual rl societal issues and banning kids will just add a delicious slip of forbidden fruit to the fuckers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The proper comment is here but I’ll quote. 

“In the future we are going to look back on seeing children use iPads that directly connect them to the most sophisticated engagement and manipulation algorithms ever as something as horrid as a child smoking a cigarette, or doing any other drug”

Are you aware of dark patterns? How’re they’re all through websites and games now? To the extent that AI now inadvertently writes websites to include because practically all data their trainings are polluted with them? Simply “educating” people out of what amounts to nearly hostile platforms and algorithms is ludicrous. I get a lot of the criticism for the bill I do. People try to pin this as people crying “think about children” and “just let parents work it out” are woefully misinformed and parent have been failing for decades now.

I also thinks it worth noting that the senators in opposition (and unsurprisingly now commenter) all seems to be using highly emotive language to criticise the bill. A lot of reducto ad absurdum going on as well (like 3 comments I’ve seen so far with “think of the children” nonsense). Frankly pretty telling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I think you're rather missing the point.

Yes, we have dark patterns, we have algorithms subtly coded and designed to drive us towards desired outcomes. These are the problems, and hitting the age of 16 won't make them go away. It won't make you less susceptible. That's explicitly why I referred to my inlaws falling down the batshit rabbit hole. There is no immunity from this

If you actually want to tackle the issue, you educate and you punish the behaviour. This utter crap of legislation does nothing to address the issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

@Taleya

SM?
Sado-masochism?

Ohhhh....
Social Media!

Come to think of it, aren't they the same thing?

@CTDummy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The social media problem is a media literacy problem. You don't teach media literacy by shielding children from media. It's a legislative band-aid in lieu of a solution that we can't be assed to implement.

Nevermind that the purported exemption for Youtube, presumably on the basis that Youtube is useful, is not objective.Tiktok and other platforms have equal potential for usefulness - and if you don't think so, I'd challenge you to explain why?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The proper comment is here but I’ll quote. 

“In the future we are going to look back on seeing children use iPads that directly connect them to the most sophisticated engagement and manipulation algorithms ever as something as horrid as a child smoking a cigarette, or doing any other drug”

Are you aware of dark patterns? How’re they’re all through websites and games now? To the extent that AI now inadvertently writes websites to include because practically all data their trainings are polluted with them? Simply “educating” people out of what amounts to nearly hostile platforms and algorithms is ludicrous. I get a lot of the criticism for the bill I do. People try to pin this as people crying “think about children” and “just let parents work it out” are woefully misinformed and parent have been failing for decades now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

It's pretty bad, but the hyperbole comparison to a global leading cause of premature death is a bit over the top. Besides, as I previously addressed: this legislation will not solve the problem, neither by its intent or practical application.

The Luddites had good points, but ultimately the species continues marching forward and is better off for it.