this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3622 readers
193 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Australian Senate, last sitting of the year. No idea when the Social Media Ban debate is kicking off.

If anyone's keen, feel free to give a live run-down of anything interesting in this thread.

(sorry about all the edits, just trying to get a decent thumbnail: elevated photo of the Australian Senate)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

They prolly don't know it exists. If they do, be prepared to switch instance as I doubt lodion will want to deal with Id checking

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I, and at least one other person here sent submissions in specifically mentioning the fediverse.

Mine wasn't a very technical submission, i tried to focus on the value and potential destruction of that value if safeguards aren't allowed for nascent social media.

So at least there is a record of it. My worry is all the Muskivites submissions will drown out ones like mine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's not even clear yet what form the ID checking will take. They've rushed this through way too fast and without proper consultation. But there does seem to be some sort of a plan that the ID checking would be done by a government service in some manner, rather than users needing to send ID directly to the platform.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Govt service is still bad, still links everyones social media accounts to their ID. The bill will do jackshit anyways, as under 16s will simply move to social media hosted outside of Australia.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So of the top ofnyour head, a VPN will allow you to skirt this law?

I don't use social media beyond lemmy but be fucked if I want to give my I.D to anyone in relation to my online activities

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, a VPN fakes your country, and the law only applies in Australia. Also, it is an unenforceable law anyways so I doubt it would do much

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

@eatham

Yes, but Social Media apps can derive location data through other means, including time zone and language settings, visible WiFi Access Points, not to mention GPS.

The Libs passed the legislation because they're corrupt.
Labor passed it because they're incompetent.

Either way, it's likely that the AustGov will be the gatekeepers of 'onboarding' and re-verification of existing users.

It's a disgrace.

@Aussiemandeus

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

"are you over 16" clicks yes well your honour they clearly provided false data so it's not our farkin' problem.

because honestly what fucking 16 year old has a proof of age card

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Last I saw the suggestions were drivers license or equivalent, face scan, or digital id. They’ve probably walked that back though or will do so because hell nah

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Govt service, or privatised age-assurance face-scanning service wrought with error?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Like I said, it's not clear yet what form it will take.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'll take that as a no

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The info is still really vague but seemed to so far apply to big platforms like reddit and facebook and X - however my info might be outdated by now.

Then again it could be that the fines for non compliance and verification charges might also apply to smaller platforms with less available funding than the big companies, and push them under.

The info I’ve been reading seems to be inconsistent and sometimes even conflict. And yeah, could be outdated by now

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The relevant Minister will be able to give exemptions as needed, but unfortunately there is no threshold for any sort of minimum size requirement or for non-profit community groups. So we would probably, to be completely lawful, need to get chummy with some politicians who can reach out to the Minister and seek an exemption.

(But realistically, we're probably small enough that nobody would notice.)

[–] Jumuta 8 points 1 day ago

it's seriously annoying as fuck how there's no exemption for any of these internet regulations based on size, all it it seriously achieves is strengthening corpos and depowering individuals with souls