this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
16 points (73.5% liked)
Progressive Politics
1657 readers
134 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's because they have. For Democrats, winning elections is more of an unintended side effect to campaigning, raising funds, and making connections.
If Democrats hold the reins of power, they'll be expected to do something with that power. Their rich donors don't want Democrats to do what the voters elected them to do, so they invent BS reasons for why they won't do it.
"Oh we may have a majority in the house and senate, but we don't have a super majority. Sorry, we can't do anything."
"Oh that thing we said we were going to do? Whoops! Turns out an unelected parlamentarian that we're the boss of says we can't do the thing you wanted. Sorry."
"Oh, executive orders are a thing? Well, we think it would be more respectful to the tradition of democracy if we had bipartisan support rather than just doing things unilaterally. Sorry."
Democrats much prefer to be the minority party. That way they don't actually have to do anything and can still fundraise and curry favor with elites.