this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
-26 points (25.9% liked)

conservative

943 readers
14 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Its not often a boycott works, but when it does, its beautiful.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PizzaMan Okay, okay… an individualistic solution for individualism… not great so: At all political levels; implement a maximum number of terms allowed to eliminate career politicians. And; Proportional representation which creates more minority governments (forcing people & parties to work together) and increase voter turnout (the health of a democracy is directly proportional to the percentage of citizens who vote)… more I’m sure, but this poop is only so long.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

implement a maximum number of terms allowed to eliminate career politicians

I can agree with that.

Proportional representation which creates more minority governments

Do you mean to suggest we get rid of the electoral collage in favor of a popular vote? If so then I also agree.

and increase voter turnout

How do you suggest we do this?

more I’m sure, but this poop is only so long.

I respect the honestly lmao.

I have some ideas for the "more" part.

  • Lobbying (bribery) of any kind at any government level should be criminalized

  • Changing from the electoral collage to popular vote

  • RCV or approval voting to reduce the polarization/extremism of candidates and allow for 3rd parties to exist

  • Election spending reform - All candidates for a given position should equally share campaign money from a shared pool

  • Journalism reform - No journalism should be done for profit, and the penalty for lying (including lying by omission) to the public should be severe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PizzaMan Proportional Representation would eliminate the electoral college. Though I am not too sure how it would work for the presidency. Here’s a site that explains it much better than I ever would. https://www.fairvote.ca/what-is-proportional-representation/.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PizzaMan It seems like a blend of the RCV and approval systems, though there are a few variations on each. No one system is ideal for every time and space.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It seems we more or less agree on that point then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PizzaMan Countries that use a proportional representation system typically have a higher voter turnout than countries that do not. Seeing a group of people in the ruling body(ies) that actually represents the entire constituency brings more people to the table. Feeling that your vote actually matters is empowering. Empowered people care and participate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Also agreed here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PizzaMan Journalism: I like severe consequences for lying, though a baseline for ‘truth’ would be difficult to determine collectively. A not for profit media seems more trustworthy than profit models, but even today, people do not trust state run media unless it fits their biases. Sorry for responding piecemeal to all your points. Getting dishes done and putting kids to bed while trying to have a beer is very distracting. Also sorry for formatting. Still learning mastodon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A not for profit media seems more trustworthy than profit models, but even today, people do not trust state run media unless it fits their biases.

Non profit != state run.

Non profit is simply a tax filing method in which your financial records are public, and any money that is made doesn't go to shareholders. It goes to maintaining the organization, no more.

Sorry for responding piecemeal to all your points. Getting dishes done and putting kids to bed while trying to have a beer is very distracting

No worries, all good.

Also sorry for formatting. Still learning mastodon.

Again no worries. And I'm actually not on mastodon, I'm on lemmy.world. But it is cool how the two services work together.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PizzaMan Fuck lobbyists. I agree entirely; throw them all in the volcano. (I assume that’s what you meant by ‘criminalize’)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yup, that's more or less what I mean.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PizzaMan I absolutely love your spending reform idea. I have a feeling that many politicians would as well. Most of them hate hitting the phones to whine for more donations. Their overlords would not like the idea though. Elections are big business.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Their corp overlords wouldn't like it so it has no chance of ever happening unfortunately.