this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
661 points (80.9% liked)

memes

10482 readers
2297 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
661
Probably the easiest boycott you could do, let's do it Lemmy! (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
583 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starman2112 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But they don't even pretend to be anarchists, they're Marxist-Leninists, hence the ml

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If "they dont even pretend to be anarchists", then why would the comment

They're not anarchists tho. Don't associate anarchism with .ml bullshit

be necessary in the first place?

[–] starman2112 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If you look at the comment above that one, you might be able to figure it out

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The comment above demonstrates that non-ml members perceive ml members as claiming anarchy among their values. If that impression exists, there must be a reason for it - which is that ml members do in fact claim to be anarchists.

Therefore, in the context of this thread, it is valid to point out the existence of self-styled anarchists claiming that other self-styled anarchists are "not real anarchists". The existence of this thread demonstrates the truth of the statement, regardless of whether you personally like the conclusion or not.

[–] starman2112 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The comment above demonstrates that non-ml members perceive ml members as claiming anarchy among their values. If that impression exists, there must be a reason for it - which is that ml members do in fact claim to be anarchists.

Please don't try to make a logical argument when you can't get this right. The comment above only demonstrates that at least one non-.ml user perceives .ml users as being self-proclaimed anarchists. There must be a reason for that, and that reason does not have to be that .ml users are self-proclaimed anarchists. It could be that this commenter is simply misinterpreting the views of .ml users.

You didn't even get the fallacy right. Rockerface didn't modify their statement at all. All they said was that the users of .ml instances aren't anarchists. You never provided any examples of anarchist .ml users, and they never modified their initial claim to protect it from a falsifying example.