this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
186 points (98.4% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3799 readers
836 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Ironically, what if that's how our actual reality is even? It's at least plausible, not that - as you said - it would make any difference if true.

Moreover, there are postulated by string theory to be 11 dimensions (I mean... who knows whether that is true, but we are speaking hypotheticals here regardless of instantiation of any one actual implementation), yet we only occupy 3 spatial and 1 time. The other spatial, and perhaps more interesting the other potential time, dimensions all offer numerous possibilities.

The ancient book Flatland does a pretty great job exploring that concept imho.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I doubt I'll ever read the book but the wikipedia article about it was quite interesting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The author died >100 years ago, so the entire text is public domain if anyone wants to read it. https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Flatland

I don't like reading books on a screen but... it is hard to pass up free - then again, libraries also exist and THIS BOOK IS WORTHWHILE.

I could barely put it down the entire time I read it, it just consumed me.

Just a note, it is actually so offensive to a woman's role in society that many (most? I have no idea) scholars think that it was so over-the-top that it must have been meant as a critique of the then-status-quo.

This book has fucking VISION, even centuries into the future.

img

Hopefully it won't remain so for millennia as well - bc of the thoughts finally becoming commonplace in society; but even then it would remain as a historical milestone towards that fantastic end.:-)

[–] AwesomeLowlander 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just a note, it is actually so offensive to a woman’s role in society that many (most? I have no idea) scholars think that it was so over-the-top that it must have been meant as a critique of the then-status-quo.

The author outright stated that it was meant as a critique in the 2nd edition, so there's no need to guess :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was that the actual author, or a statement added on their behalf? I thought I recalled reading it as the latter, where it seemed they were just guessing.

Either way it could be a kind of trigger warning for someone who even knowing that wouldn't want to read the text.

[–] AwesomeLowlander 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was the actual author, who got annoyed that people couldn't recognise satire. Not much different from today, in other words 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Hehe. Thanks for sharing that.

In fairness, there are a LOT of kinds of people in the world - e.g. I would have thought that someone advocating to block access to medically necessary abortions would surely have been satire but... nope.

As with any form of message passing, the meaning depends on both the sender and the recipient - I would argue far more so the former, but some extremely selfish people would just as vehemently argue that the latter is all that matters to them.🤷

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)