21
‘Look, they’re getting skin!’: are we right to strive to save the world’s tiniest babies?
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)
Excellent Reads
1577 readers
20 users here now
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.
Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.
Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.
Rules:
- Common Sense. Civility, etc.
- Server rules.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As someone who was born early at low birth weight who has suffered increasingly bad health problems for my entire life: No. "Saving" them is cruel and selfish. It spares the feelings of the parents at the expense of the child.
And I wasn't anywhere near as early as this article goes into.
The question as always is, where should the line be drawn? And realistically, the parents are the ones with the most say over the decision, so it's never going to be a purely logical choice.
I don't know where the line should be drawn, but there should be a line, and it should be going in the opposite direction. Yeah, you can keep the fetus alive outside of a body. And then it can suffer for decade after decade after decade.