66
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Highlighting that in the article researchers found that the average chat with ChatGPT is the equivalent of dumping one bottle of water on the floor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] noneabove1182 17 points 11 months ago

The article doesn't address it, maybe someone here can.. what does "consumed" mean? Where does the water go after it's used to cool? Surely it's reusable, right?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

From here:

Google financed the development of a "sidestream facility" about five miles away from its data center. The system intercepts water from the Douglas County Water and Sewer Authority’s treatment plant that would otherwise be discharged into the Chattahoochee River — which holds status as a National Water Trail. That water is then sent to Google’s facility for use in the cooling process. Any water that isn’t evaporated is treated using effluent equipment at Google’s site, and then returned to the river.

The article notes that some of that water is ground water that's drinkable, too. But there's no proportion of drinkable to waste water provided.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

That’s actually a fantastic use of resources. Their chillers probably work much for efficiently. It’s similar to traditional power plants.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

No, it isn't. The key conceit is they are removing water from the river and evaporating it.

The water isn't 'lost' it is still part of the hydrosphere, but it is made non-local. That water goes into the air and will go on to be rain in some place far away from the community where it was sourced. This will absolutely contrubute to local droughts and water insecurity.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

To add to what the other person said, I went looking and couldn’t find any solid answers. Part of it might be that Google considers their water use details as proprietary information they’re not keen on sharing, and there’s so many sites in so many different jurisdictions that I’d be surprised if there was an overarching solution.

I thought this article went into it decently: https://time.com/5814276/google-data-centers-water/

[-] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

We have this amazing process for saving water. Shame on other company for not using a similar method. By the way we aren’t sharing how we do it and if you happen to do a similar method and release those details we will likely cry corporate espionage.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

They're saving water the same way VW lowered their emissions (lying about it).

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
66 points (86.7% liked)

Technology

55935 readers
2967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS