Psychology

469 readers

1 users here now

A place for articles, discussions and questions about psychology – the science of mind and behavior. It is a multidisciplinary field, covering behavioral, cognitive, developmental, educational, neuro-biological, personality, and social studies (and more!).

Rules:

Do not take or give direct medical advice in your posts or comments.
Absolutely no bigotry, hate speech or discrimination. That includes (but is not limited to) ableism, antisemitism, islamophobia, queer*- and LGBTQIA*-phobia, racism, and sexism.
Keep discussions in good faith and be respectful.
Posts should be related to academic, applied or clinical psychology in some way.
Titles should be relevant to the content and not misleading.
Do not post links to your own surveys, spam or self-help tips/videos.

Friends and related communities:

Banner: "A cross section of a mouse brain stained with cortical layer specific proteins" by Mamunur Rashid, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons / height edited to fit as banner

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What would you suggest if you were helping design a healthier social network? (lemmy.eco.br)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For example, would removing infinite scrolling help make it less addictive? Would you keep the upvote/downvote system, remove it, or classify posts differently to foster better discussions? How about adding a countdown timer to log the user out after a certain number of hours of use?

If psychological research can be used to keep users engaged on a social network for as long as possible, I believe it can also be applied to help prevent excessive use, improve the quality of discussions, and create a more empathetic environment. That’s why I’d love to hear suggestions from those in the field.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Posts with heated arguments (detected as having more than a certain number of comments/replies per minute), get shown to fewer people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't you mean those replies under the heated posts should be shown to fewer people? If you mean to hide the post entirely, people could weaponize this mecanism to hide posts they don't agree with from others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

You'd need a way to prevent abuse, but I meant the actual post.

Current algorithms consider heated arguments to be an indicator of highly engaging content, so add fuel to the fire by showing it to more people. What's needed is the opposite.