this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

Toronto Cycling

141 readers
136 users here now

All things cycling in Toronto

Links:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sarkaria (Ontario's transportation minister) said Friday that only 1.2 per cent of people use those bike lanes to commute to work, compared with 70 per cent who drive, and the lanes are taking away nearly half of the infrastructure on those roads, making commutes longer for drivers.

Why hasn't anyone challenged the use of that statistic?

Commuting isn't the only way to use transportation infrastructure and bike lanes, so it's incredibly dishonest to say that "only 1.2%" are using those particular bike lanes.

If I use bike lanes for 100% of my errands and 0% for commuting, does that invalidate those lanes?

By the same token, at what point would they consider removing sidewalks if people aren't using them specifically to walk to work?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is why I don't support bike lanes without education for cyclists. Literally 15 minutes ago

Zipping past elderly and toddlers on the sidewalk, while the hard curve divided bike lane sits empty. And this happens multiple times a day.

Until cyclists don't lose their shit when you suggest they educate themselves and use etiquette, you guys can't handle bike lanes.

My photo is a perfect example of you guys getting what you wanted but refusing to use it, while being an asshole to pedestrians. Get rid of them, it's clear you guys don't use em

[โ€“] CowsLookLikeMaps 1 points 1 week ago

Have you ever used a crosswalk at an intersection with cars? People constantly take a run at pedestrians and run red light which kills people all the time. Drivers constantly park in bike lanes next to empty driveways and empty parking lots. Does that mean I should not support roads for cars because "you guys can't handle bike lanes?" See how absurd of a statement that is?

load more comments (3 replies)