this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
122 points (99.2% liked)
science
14867 readers
48 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.
2024-11-11
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can't find it in the article, but I assume this is the same as all the other plastic eating organisms; They can eat plastic under specific circumstances, but would rather not. What is in the article; they can only survive on polystyrene if it is mixed with other food and nutrients.
Not true.
Many of the ones fed only polystyrene for a month did survive, they just fared poorly as with any organism that’s eating only one substance for an entire month. But they did live, which is pretty impressive.
They have gut bacteria that can break down polystyrene for nutrition. They just can’t eat only polystyrene and nothing else and thrive. It’s mostly an area of research because they want to use the bacteria in processing waste, not that the mealworms are going to be the answer as-is.
We're going to develop or find some efficient life form to break down plastics quickly. Solve our waste problem. And it's going to get loose into the wild and start breaking down plastics everywhere, uncontrollably. Straight out of Larry Niven's Ringworld series (theirs was a superconductor-eating bug).
Probably not though, that's just science fiction that never happens in reality. The nylon-eating bacteria that naturally evolved found long ago in waste areas never broke out to destroy all nylon. So at least there's an example of it not happening.
I'm confident that it will happen, these things just take time. There's enough energy floating around bound up in plastic polymers, and the chemistry is simple enough, that something will learn to make use of it. 100 years is just way too short in evolutionary time for it to happen on a large scale.
Dead on. It happened with trees, and wood is still useful.
Maybe we should be happy it doesn't happen, breaking down all plastics which are currently everywhere would probably result in massive CO2 emissions. That's why I'm always sceptical when these kind of articles appear; it gives some people an excuse to say the overuse of plastics isn't an issue.
That's fine, really. Eco problem solved and we need alternatives to plastic (made of oil) in the next few tens of years anyway.
~~Do they even process it or is the goal just to have plastic waste but with extra steps?~~
Oh, they can break it down.