this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1628 points (99.2% liked)

Firefox

18063 readers
91 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm hoping the average user will be sufficient annoyed by the lack of adblocking to finally give a shit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Average users view the web raw, this will go totally unnoticed by >90% of users. If web-drm becomes a thing then it will be easy enough to block those sites and add them to the list of media that is morally acceptable to pirate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is there any reason Firefox or anyone else can't just draw blank elements over the ads to block them on a separate layer? That way the site still thinks ads are being displayed. Kind of like the browser internal version of cutting out sticky notes and pasting them over your screen to cover the ads.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Firefox could get litigated for ad fraud and these trusted 3rd parties could block firefox from accessing the sites. It won't work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Time to fly the Jolly Roger and find ways to get entire websites, not just movies and TV shows, off the high seas and past the blockade. Drink up, me hearties, yo ho!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I believe that's the same as uBO's cosmetic filters. They're loaded but not shown..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The most valuable sites are already advertisement free. Anyone remaining who implements this standard just reduces their viewers. People will do without or other sites will offer an alternative. The tech is doomed to fail because the consumer is always right.