this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
20 points (95.5% liked)

Wikipedia

1590 readers
297 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Bears are pretty chill honestly. I would generally take a bear over a strange man or woman in the woods. Unknown humans with unknown means and intentions are much more dangerous than a bear, hands down. In order: bear, woman, man. But it's like 85% bear, 10% woman, 5% man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only bear I'd be concerned about was a bear with a cub. If you see one, you are already in danger. So I'd say single bear > woman > man >>> bear with cub

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you see one, you are already in danger.

I live somewhere where the most deadly animal we have are horses.

Is it just that being close enough to see a bear and cub is close enough that the bear considers you an imminent threat?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently this mainly applies to grizzlies. Black bears with cubs may make a display but basically don't attack

[–] merde 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

100% bear, 0% women/men

or is it the inverse 0% bear, 100% women/men

people are easy. A bear can climb as well as running faster than me