AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

712 readers

532 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1130

Universal health care (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

135 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

employee share of contribution to public health insurance fund

If your employer takes part of your wages and pays, or you take part of your wages and pay. What's the difference?

The "employee share" vs "employer share" makes no difference?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if you were making the point you think you're making... The US already has employer-contributions to health care, and its a whole lot. My experience likely isn't the norm as I'm in a union position, but my employer foots the bill for something like ~70% of my health insurance. They take a chunk out of my paycheck, but it's still only maybe 1/3 of what it actually costs.

So if you want it to be a fair comparison, you're going to have to take that into consideration too. If you're suggesting that an employer in an EU nation will pay someone less because they have to shell out to contribute to their health insurance, then you need to realize that the same conditions are present here.

It's not really fair to only include that on one side of the equation, when it is happening on both sides.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's a fair point I did not consider. Thank you.

I'm mainly confused about the "5% of your paycheck" claim made here.

It's way, way higher in places that do have universal healthcare, all things considered.

People unfamiliar with the system seem to often have unrealistic expectations, exacerbated by political propaganda.