this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
-9 points (26.3% liked)
Economy
454 readers
310 users here now
Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The funny thing is how quickly "millionaire" has become a meaningless term.
iirc in the 1989 Batman movie Bruce Wayne is still described as a 'millionaire.' By 2004 he was a 'billionaire.'
At this point, anyone with a house could come up with $1 million.
Also she’s from the Bay Area, every house starts at a million. So just owning a home in the area she lived and worked in would make her a millionaire by default. It’s such a bad metric.
I think it was Isaac Asimov who wrote that we use 'astronomical' to describe vast amounts, but that eventually we'd replace 'astronomical' with 'financial'