this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
358 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58833 readers
4615 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So what are we supposed to do?

Not sanction Russia?

Apply sanctions on an individual basis?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Are you under the impression I'm some kind of strategical genius of political negotiation? I have no idea.

My point is that holding everybody responsible for what the specific form of government of the specific country they happened to be born into is a confortable truth to push back on the much more controversial take of all of us being the very same thing.

And to get slightly more practical, it's asinine to suggest that anybody that disagrees with a government has the means, or the will, or the duty to straight up move to another country (obviously to a flawless country, good luck with that).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I'll ask differently. Let's just assume there is a way to make sure there is no overreach of sanctions, but it's going to cost millions of tax dollars or euros. Would you rather have that money spent on things that are close to you (education, healthcare, infrastructure etc) or would you want that money to be spent identifying which Russians should or shouldn't be sanctioned?

And to get slightly more practical, it’s asinine to suggest that anybody that disagrees with a government has the means, or the will, or the duty to straight up move to another country (obviously to a flawless country, good luck with that).

I agree, somethings shit just sucks. However, the other person said:

even of people who’ve long moved out and immigrated years ago and don’t support the invasion and war waged on Ukraine

Those people have already had the means, will or duty to move to another country. What's their excuse for keeping the Russian citizenship?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Those people have already had the means, will or duty to move to another country. What’s their excuse for keeping the Russian citizenship?

There's plenty of reason, the most likely is that they love their country, their homeland, their city, the network of friends, the memories and they hope, one day, to be able to get back.

Let’s just assume there is a way to make sure there is no overreach of sanctions, but it’s going to cost millions of tax dollars or euros. Would you rather have that money spent on things that are close to you (education, healthcare, infrastructure etc) or would you want that money to be spent identifying which Russians should or shouldn’t be sanctioned?

Would you still love me if I was a giant moth?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There’s plenty of reason, the most likely is that they love their country, their homeland, their city, the network of friends, the memories and they hope, one day, to be able to get back.

So it's literally their decision to keep their citizenship and be sanctioned, but you're still outraged about it?

Would you still love me if I was a giant moth?

I would definitely hate you less because I really hate trolls.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago) (1 children)

I'm not a troll but it's unsurprising you are quick to hate considering your opinions toward mankind.

A country is not their government, their history is not their current posturing, the action of their military is not the expression of their local communities. The idea that since you are attached to a certain place is equivalent to sharing the broad general responsibility of its actions through history is what ultimately fuels shit like, you guessed it, the Russian invasion of Ukrain itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 minutes ago (1 children)

I’m not a troll but it’s unsurprising you are quick to hate considering your opinions toward mankind.

You're literally avoiding answering the hard questions and instead throw up shit like that moth thing. That is standard troll behavior. Just because you want to believe you're not a troll doesn't mean you aren't one. Go on, prove me wrong, do the non-troll thing and actually answer my questions instead of tip-toeing around them.

A country is not their government, their history is not their current posturing, the action of their military is the expression of their local communities.

Technically they are. The country is the governing body set up by the people that make up said country. In the case of Russia that government is corrupted and that government is to the detriment to its own people and now also a detriment to the surrounding countries. I am sympathetic to the struggles of the average Russian, but unlike you I don't live in la-la land where everyone gets to have and eat their cake. They've let their country slip into corruption and ultimately that is on them because we can't fix that without an even greater conflict. They've let their government get corrupted and the actions of that corrupt government has brought sanctions upon them.

And I get that not all of them are to blame, but we get back to the questions you deliberately avoided. Are we not supposed to sanction Russia and let them have their way with Ukraine? If we should sanction Russia and there is a costly way to make sure those sanctions wouldn't overreach, do you want your tax money to be spent essentially on the well-being of Russians. Even if you know you're likely to gain little to no benefit from that spending?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

I was making what I thought was an obvious equivalence between your realistically impossible to answer question to the impossible question an insecure partner blurts out.

Are you asking what value I give money? What price I put on human lives? If I would give up everything to keep the innocents out of harm?

You see your question is way too broad.

But of fucking course I'd be willing to spend more not to impart sufference in innocent strangers, that's the point of most things people do daily when it comes to being an ethical being. Would you enjoy saving money if Police would simply arrest everybody in a 2Km range from any murder location and call it a day?