this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
163 points (72.1% liked)

US Authoritarianism

827 readers
44 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Academic circles have preferred “American Indian” for a couple decades now. You still see “Native American” in lower-level materials (undergraduate and below), though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's mixed at best, there's no universal consensus for either one in academic circles, especially once you get to international audiences. Of course there's no universal preference among indigenous people either, so the best bet is not to talk about indigenous peoples as if they're a monolith and instead use narrower terms for just the groups you're discussing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Friend of mine got a degree in Anthropology and spent a good amount of time writing academic paper about US tribes, which required visiting different groups and interviewing them.

He said that while there was a push from academia about 30-40 years ago to refer to indigenous peoples as Native American, he said that has been completely abandoned. The reason being is that the actual Native Americans don’t consider themselves American, nor does Indian describe them as these are Anglo Colonizer words.

When referring to themselves they will either go by the name of their tribe or they say they are Indian, because when they speak English they use English words to describe themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He said that while there was a push from academia about 30-40 years ago to refer to indigenous peoples

Academics don't care what you call other people. They aren't pushing anyone to do anything, except perhaps for people in their fields to recognize their novel, useful ideas.

All that matters to the academy is what peers are calling something. And that basically boils down to trends in language and the decisions the editors in chief of a few influential journals and a few influential authors in whatever field. You can say whatever you want. If you submit a paper for publication though they're probably going to change yours to their own preferred usage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yep, cool, I just meant trend, maybe ‘push’ was a poor choice of words.