this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
156 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

1135 readers
185 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

LibreWolf

Why are privacy/copyleft advocates so bad at naming?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Mintest, after only just (*inhales)

13 YEARS

finally rebranded to... something starting with "Lua". And I already forget the rest of the name because FOSS people suck at naming.

And I only even remembered the first part because I had once written mods in Lua, Mintest's scripting language of choice. Good luck for name recognition with anybody else.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They usually don't have marketing departments or focus groups.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You obviously don't need those to come up with a good name; just some taste. Signal is a great example. Ladybird and Servo are good browser names if you want to stick to that. LibreWolf? Jesus, come on guys. Forgejo is another terrible name I heard recently. Apparently it's Esperanto, like that makes it ok somehow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently it’s Esperanto, like that makes it ok somehow.

God forbid some non-anglophone culture enters our collective consciousness.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What would you call it instead?

We already have (had) Iceweasel, IceCat and Waterfox among others. All nice word plays on the original Firefox name. LibreWolf follows along the same path.