this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
28 points (86.8% liked)

Linux

6050 readers
237 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
28
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I hear that a lot but, how bad is it really? Does it affect you (if you use Debian)? Aren't there ways to install newer versions of most things that actually matter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@JackbyDev The "Out of date" is good for a server, as long as security patches are backported (debian does this). Out of date is not good for a desktop. I want to get the new releases of the Window Manager, office suite, browser, etc.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Out of date is not good for a desktop.

Some call it out of date, others call it stable. If you want your computer to simply work as you are used to and to not bother you with new features and bugs, Debian is a nice distro for Desktop as well.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"To simply work" relies on a specific use case.

A relative of mine used to do music on Linux and often compiled obscure software for music production from Github. Debian and even some Ubuntu derivatives sometimes lacked the required build chain versions.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

When your use case relies on using some most up to date software, then Debian (stable) obviously is not the distro of choice. But that case is not what I meant with 'simply work', i.e. using the same (major) version of software for several years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly why Debian is my go to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It's the same for me.