this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Neuroscience

302 readers
1 users here now

A place for discussions about neuroscience and neuroscience careers.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right, I just don't like it when we invest huge sums on research based purely on clinical results. Better than models that don't show efficacy in clinical trials, but still, magic drugs always bother me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I get it. The companies developing these drugs or funding the research probably don’t care about fundamental knowledge. Even in pure academia people would probably rather have some publishable results than actual insight in a disease.

If they did, there could’ve been some psychiatric diseases that were actually understood as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, also read the abstract, it's positive, but there are definite questions, the increase in ventricular volume was odd for one.

I just think we haven't quite nailed the cause down yet, even if we're close, there's a wrinkle and trying to treat things we "almost understand" is risky (you can 'cure' some forms of mental illness with a lobotomy, but that's not the point).