this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)
Hardware
526 readers
242 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- AMD
- Augmented Reality
- Gaming Laptops
- Laptops
- History of Computing Hardware
- Linux Hardware
- Mechanical Keyboards
- Microcontrollers
- Monitors
- Single Board Computers
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
During autorotation you also can't steer, just want to get down safely. It's an emergency situation, you don't want to fly nicely, just land and not die.
Power compensation is a software/math problem. They can design bigger engines to compensate for the failure of some engines. Again in a situation like that you don't want a super pleasant flight you just want to survive.
(Following your logic, a motorcycle is more safe than a car, because it has only 2 wheels)
The point is we don't know, and it's not impossible. I guess Toyota has some engineers who could help in the decision.
What?
That isn't my logic at all.
I simply stated that six enginges in this configuration does not mean that is is failsafe.
A car with four wheels can get puncture in four wheels, so you have more points of failure than a motorcycle.
We can build helicopters with one engine. Adding five more engines doesn't necessarily 5 points of failures but 5 backup engines. I tried to point out that your example is not exactly right in this case.
Sigh, with regards to drones, they use the torque from the motor to steer, they are also very finely balanced, so a motor dying in flight will make it fall from the sky.
Now, this is clearly different from this device as it has (small) wings and the engines in the picture are all pointing diagonally in the same way, meaning that some lift is generated by the wings.
It might be enough to land in an emergency if an engine quits.
But a normal quad or even a hexa drone will just crash or start spinning if one engine quits.
But I am man enough to be swayed by evidence, so show me a drone with one engine quitting mid flight that doesn't just crash.
I don't know man, you should ask Toyota engineers who just payed $500M for this flying coffin. They should be really stupid for doing that,
Oh you wanted proof, quick search says here Ardupilot firmware could handle 1 motor loss with 5+ rotors in 2018: https://discuss.ardupilot.org/t/handling-motor-loss/32359
And a seven years old video of a home made hexacopter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap8ngQqt7s8
Ah, nice, I did not know that!
Thank you for sharing the video, cool!
That being said, it is one failsafe, for normal drones, but after looking further at the image of the Toyota concept, I can sort of see what you mean, as it is a different construction to that of a normal drone.