this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
223 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

60156 readers
2296 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Caveat Emptor... The burden is on the buyer to know what they are getting into. And the government should stay out of all of this. This is what republicans mean when they say small government.

Small government for civilians means no protections from large corporations.
Small government for corporations means they get to do what they want and regulate themselves.

It is the American dream.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

No the government should not stay out of it.

How does this make any sense "if you, or anyone you know, has ever bought our taxi, you can not sue when our driver hits you"?

"Buyer beware" is not an argument when this shit is buried in pages of dence leagle documents or in some case never presented to the end user (in the case of a things like appliance delivery, where the buyer never sees the documents included). Do you expect me to hire a lawyer to buy a washer machine, or to sign up for a free Disney+ trail? Speaking of Disney, how about that "allergy friendly" restuant that killed someone with allergies. Theae forced arbitration clauses are letting ~~companies~~ people get away with wrongful deaths.

implied warranty of merchantability If the restaurant says their food does not contain an ingredient and they say the food prep is craefully done to ensure no cords contamination and someone dies because the ingredient was in the food - there's a problem and justice needs to be upheld.

Being a rebublicans or wanting "small goverment" has nothing to do with this. Yes too much gov intervention is bad, but with out it we'd still be eating rats in our hamburgers.

Don't bring abritarty sides into a problem when people are dying and no one is getting held accountable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm like 80% sure they were being sarcastic in that comment. I hope so anyways.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Me too...but just to be safe I spent too much of my free time typing up a response.

[–] bob_omb_battlefield 2 points 2 months ago

Imagine hiring a taxi without having your lawyer review the terms and conditions, lol