this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

College Football

823 readers
6 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

Vote in the community poll

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Texas Texas
2. Alabama Alabama
3. Tennessee Tennessee
T-4. Oregon Oregon
T-4. Penn State Penn State
6. Ohio State Ohio State
7. Miami Miami
8. Missouri Missouri
9. Iowa State Iowa State
10. Michigan Michigan
T-11. BYU BYU
T-11. Indiana Indiana
T-11. UNLV UNLV
T-14. LSU Louisiana State
T-14. Notre Dame Notre Dame
16. USC USC
17. Clemson Clemson
18. Georgia Georgia
19. Ole Miss Mississippi
20. Oklahoma Oklahoma
21. Illinois Illinois
22. James Madison James Madison
23. Kentucky Kentucky
T-24. Duke Duke
T-24. Pitt Pitt

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With all the talking heads on TV proclaiming that this season is unlike any other, I'm curious how the community feels. Totally new landscape of CFB or just more of the same? How do we all feel about:

  • Helmet communication (for only 1 player on the field per team except on free kicks)
  • Tablets on the sidelines (up to 18 per team)
  • The 2 minute timeout
  • Corporate logos on fields (no longer requires the stadium to be named after the sponsor)
  • New homes for Arizona, ASU, Cal, CU, Oregon, ou, SMU, Stanford, Texas, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington
  • Expanded playoff (probably too early to tell on this one)
  • New TV deals (SEC on ABC, B1G on CBS)
  • Current season of Fansville (Ewers could be a Heisman candidate but he sure won't be winning any Oscars)

For reference, here are the P4 vs P4 records so far:

  • ACC: 6-8
  • B1G: 5-5 (or 5-6 if counting ND)
  • Big XII: 5-6
  • SEC: 8-5 (or 8-6 if counting ND)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's a side effect of the degree to which we all care about this silly sport, and the fact that schools have been recruiting marginal students who love the game more than class for decades. They know they de-facto can't collude to bar scholarships to transfers anymore, so it is what it is. Every solution depends on artificially restricting the movement of certain students because someone claims to know what's good for them, but doesn't give two shits about schools poaching over club chess scholarships or offering merit aid to transferring non-athletes.

I'm all for a regime that controls movement, but they have to compensate the players to give up that flexibility. Otherwise, who among us wouldn't go someplace we liked better to play the game we love either for the last time as a competitive athlete or to take one more bite at the apple of a professional future? I think you almost have to be a touch delusional to play up to your actual FBS potential, whatever that is.