Microblog Memes

5402 readers

2936 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

932

Let's play the rich get everything. The rules are the rich get everything. participation is mandatory. (lemmy.world)

submitted 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

122 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Did I say mandatory? I meant optional! You're "free" to die in a cardboard box under a freeway as a market capitalist scarecrow warning to the other ants so they keep showing up to make us more!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What you mean by "hypothetical use" vs "actual use"? In your own comment you mention nothing about "hypothetical use" yet here you talk about one, OOP also failed to mention anything about hypothetical use and only talk exclusively about unrealised gain. If unrealised gain(stock, asset, etc) is used to trade for another item, then yes, it's already a realised gain, the tax should be levied on the item purchased or the asset sold, whichever makes sense. If the unrealised gain is used to secure a loan, then no, it shouldn't be taxed because it's only change hand on paper, and the loan came with interest, and you have to pay back that loan. Net worth is nothing but a dick measuring contest, taxing it makes no sense.

So no, unrealised gain shouldn't be taxed because it's unrealised, it's like taxing a grocery store's unsold item.