this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
391 readers
49 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
“South of Scotland” is England, or France or maybe a lot of places. None of which are “southern Scotland” like the article talks about. No where does it say south of Scotland.
Even an Old Canadian knows Scotland is the blokes north of the wankers.
You'll have take it up with the South of Scotland Golden Eagle Project then.
That would make them the “wankers”
South of Scotland is in Scotland. Same way the South of England is in England and the South of France is in France. This is the first time in my life I've heard someone make this claim before
Regardless of what the article says, "South of ..." is a common way to refer to the southern end of something in English. If it said "to the south of ..." your point would be correct.
We don’t say that over here and we speak English