Open Source

29773 readers

516 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Visual Studio Code alternatives for Linux? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

While I understand the lack of proper open source alternatives for some software like AutoCAD and After Effects, it always felt weird that the best IDEs/Text Editors are made by big corporations, because you know, these are the tools programmers use.

I tried vim/neovim, which I enjoy using, but I've come to prefer visual editors instead of text based. Kate looks promising, and I'm willing to contribute to it in my free time, but it just has that "amateurish" feel to it that I can't explain.

Anyone aware of other alternatives?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can also just… pay for it? I give money to JetBrains in exchange for incredibly useful tools. It’s okay to pay for things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Considering the context of the thread, this isn't really a useful take. They were talking about free software (open source at that). They were warning them it won't be free forever and, seeing as how that is a requirement, then yeah, it would be taken away.

There's no need to be condescending when you're in the wrong conversation with your opinion. No one said you can't pay for things or that it's not ok.

So your high horse isn't needed here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What a weird take. You're allowed to pay for whatever you'd like. Personally, I can't afford to pay for any JetBrains product, even if I wanted to.

Not only are there alternatives which may be better overall or better suited to someone's needs, that wasn't even my point. My point was more that it is only temporarily free, and so the parent commenter's comment of "it's free" should be taken with a grain of salt if you're considering the product.

Moreover, we're in the Open Source community: Fleet is neither free nor open source, and pointing that out here is relevant.