this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
512 points (99.2% liked)
HistoryPorn
4585 readers
234 users here now
If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.
Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!
HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts
Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings
Related Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes. Items placed in the world decay over time, for reasons explained in game. All the player built infrastructure needs to be maintained.
Makes sense, thanks. So then that leaves me with my remaining question: are there enough players left to maintain things? Or is it kind of a "hopeless cause" scenario now, cause things are decaying faster than people can maintain them, due to a lower player count?
It's possible, though arduous, to maintain it all solo. The game fragments who sees what so even at peak you generally only saw things built by a small subsection of the playerbase, so no one ended up presented with just everything already done and nothing to do. Steam is only showing daily peaks of about 1000, but that's still more than enough for a healthy mix of established and unbuilt infrastructure, I'd expect.
edit: And actually the all-time peak on Steam for the Director's cut was only about 6000. So the 1000 daily peak now is definitely fine.
Excellent; thank you for your detailed replies.