this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
42 points (88.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5153 readers
354 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Just a point - biomass regenerates and sucks carbon while it does.

Coal gets burnt and stays out there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I think we should generally differentiate between biomass that has been grown for the sole purpose of being burned (bad), and biomass that's just organic matter as part of the waste system that cannot be otherwise recycled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

That's interesting.

Biomass that is grown to be burned is completely sustainable, increases the earths carrying capacity and provides economic growth, profit and jobs. Triple bottom line.

Biomass burned as waste is just incineration with a bit of green washing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that much biomass burning happens in the form of "take a mature forest, which existed for other reasons, and burn it for the purpose of generating electricity." This means that you go from having a large mature forest, to having large areas of immature forest.

This on net adds CO2 to the atmosphere until several decades after it stops.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Different areas - you are correct with what you said.

My comment was specifically on those grown to be burned for biomass. Taking a mature forest on the other hand is indeed a problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actual biomass power plants operating today are buying forests to burn them. Those which run in the manner you describe are exceedingly rare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Not denying that - wish I could though....

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)