politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Now if only all the third party progressive candidates were as smart as a dude with brain worms.
For some, genocide is a deal-breaker.
Jill Stein and others will continue to fight for long terms goals of breaking the duopoly.
Are you suggesting Trump would support the genocide any less?
The duopoly supports genocide; Trump is a part of the duopoly.
Jill Stein does not support the genocide; she is openly anti-genocide.
Jill Stein is a spoiler candidate. I supported her in 2016 and regretted it. The green party only exists to siphon votes from dems. They have no down ballot candidates. Basically they exist because of GOP and Russia support.
Do people still believe these smears and duopoly talking points...
I see Blue MAGA and MAGA as the spoiler candidates.
If your main concern is to continue "winning" the elections, vote for the dupoly. We can vote however we like.
If you would like to fight and work on building a better future for the working class, I suggest looking at other candidates while also helping build up a grassroots movement in your community or by joining one.
There is no hope for a decent future unless Trump is defeated. All this both sides bullshit leads to Trump being elected again. You are, at best, naive if you think otherwise. Honestly you sound like a non-american troll or someone barely old enough to vote.