this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3507 readers
122 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The size of the fine is irrelevant. What matters is the fine being proportionally punitive that it deters similar actions, instead of being viewed as another overhead and the cost of doing business.

If you steal a car, sell it and make 10k, the cops don't fine you 5k. They take the whole lot and more. If they only took 5k, then the cops are operating more like a coconspirator in the racketeering; taking their cut of a profitable crime, that is guaranteed to be repeated.

A corporation will factor in the cost of legal fees + settlement, plus the probability of any action taken against them in the first place. So if they're only investigated 1% of the time, the fine for a crime should be multiplied 100x whatever profit they made, at the very least.