Memes

I go on plenty of long rants, I have no right to complain. I'll try to address what I find to be the more productive points.

Nobody really uses the word liberalism anymore

Here and elsewhere you exhibit a serious myopia. Can I imagine that there are some places, especially in the US, where use of the term as anything other than "Democrat" has died out? Of course. Does that mean in the whole world no one is using it? Absolutely not, there are many countries where its use is much more common and political analysts still use it even in America.

Like how would you define the difference between liberalism and neoliberalism?

Liberalism is a general philosophical movement that I have already defined. Neoliberalism is the dominant strain within the broader movement that is oriented around American imperial hegemony.

That word was specifically created to delineate the "rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law".

I don't care what Wikipedia told you about neoliberalism, that is not the history of the term. Neoliberalism emerged as a reactionary opposition to social democracy (which was popular due to the gains socialism was making in the East) once the Cold War started drawing to a close.

Using concepts as defined pre 1960 is problematic at least because we had massive advances in science and understanding of how humans, society and economics and systems of power work. Game theory, mass psychology, sociology, and technology has advanced

When I read this, I screamed into a pillow, I am so sick of seeing this fucking argument. It's just an excuse for philistinism (i.e. ignorance and refusal to study), and for throwing out ideas hostile to American hegemony (since the apotheosis of neoliberalism was circa 1980). Let's just throw out gravity, nitrogen fixing, democracy, representative government, and all the rest of it because now we have smartphones! But I'm being uncharitable, you give a more specific condition in a moment:

so that we know these ideas as seen originally do not work, since we have historical evidence of their failure

When a new system emerges and is smashed by the old powers, that does not establish that the idea "doesn't work" but that the historical circumstances of its emergence then and there was unable to resist reactionary forces, which is a useful datapoint, but not for the argument "gommulism doesn't work".

The opposite of someone what believes in liberal values is a fascist

If we're using "liberal" like most people in the world use liberal, this is completely incorrect and that fact is well-established by history. Fascism as a historical movement was born as anticommunist resistance aimed at preserving capitalism, which is why the Nazis had immense help from liberal foreign powers who they would later attack. Fascism is not the opposite of liberalism, it is liberalism in decay and fighting viciously for its own preservation.

In my opinion, any serious socialist or communist today must be in favor of "limited personal free market" where individuals or small groups of individuals have the liberty to produce, innovate and become entrepreneur,

This is too big a topic, we can get back to it later if you want. My short answer is that you are relying on buzzwords that completely obfuscate what you are talking about.

because we now know that this is a fundamental expression of human nature. E.g. build some cool keyboards and sell them on etsy or whatever

???? This has the fun quality that you are either saying that trying to be, like, a CEO is fundamental to human nature, which is baseless nonsense, or you are saying something more along the lines of "humans like creating things and changing their environment, perfecting and reinventing tools to streamline production and so on" which is literally basic Marx!

And I doubt you'd find serious socialists today that really want to defend the original maxist/leninist or maoist theories of socialism.

You will find Marxists all over the world, myself included, who will tell you that the basic principles of Marxism are correct and that having an actually successful socialist movement depends on not distorting them. Incidentally, you can read the Lenin I linked you to learn all about people trying to distort Marxism back circa 1914.

Like before, you are demonstrating myopia. I'm sure you don't know any Marxists (evidently) and you probably haven't met very many on the internet, but there are multiple Marxist countries and countless Marxist movements around the world. Maybe they (not necessarily I, but they) have something to teach you that you can't get from pontificating and navel-gazing.

I believe 90% of all humans share the same values but are reprogrammed through lies and emotional manipulation.

This is elitist nonsense and I will link you to my favorite essay, though it's a little long and circuitous: https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

The short version is that people act in their self-interest and it takes a fair amount of education, whether through lived experience or exposition, to understand that their interest is with the common interest. People broadly espouse falsehoods not because they have been cleverly tricked, but because they care about what is "really true" far less than they care about what it does for them to do that espousing.

I believe that instead of arguing about the finer points of old ideologies from the barbarous times pre 1950 we should be working on tools to control or negate these corrosive and corrupting influences (Wealth caps? Sortition? AI?).

AI is garbage techno-rapturism and sortition was literally used in ancient Athens, meaning it should be thrown out if we follow your logic (along with voting generally). Wealth caps are not asset caps, so they are meaningless here.

The liberals should be your allies.

You have two choices, either start using liberal like the world does or, I guess, conclude that the Democrats are also part of the right, because I can tell you with confidence that Biden has never been and never will be my ally. Either choice is an improvement from current conditions, I suppose.