this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
243 points (98.8% liked)

Anarchism

181 readers
18 users here now

A community for anarchist. Anarchism is a set of philosophies that promotes a world free of hierarchical systems.

No electioneering, no telling people to or not to vote or who to vote for. Interpretating this rule as forbidding critisism of candidates is certainty an interpretation but in the context of an ANARCHIST space it's a bad interpretation.

No bootlicking & that will include being hyper pedantic about people calling politicians, prosecutors, bureaucrats, etc, cops.

Yes, if you're an obnoxious neo-lib you're going to get banned. If you're not obnoxious & have good faith questions you can stay.

All Capybara Are Bros IDTSCJSTDNBDLFTSATICLPE

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/15059816

transcript [text overlaid on several pictures of benches and outside windowsills. the benches have bars, or gaps to prevent someone from sleeping on them.

text reads "Ban anti-homeless arctithecture"]

sauce: https://mastodon.social/@AnarchistArt/112901196516297447

Hostile architecture is among the symptoms of the hostile modern city, where neighbours never say hi, and people die on the streets as people walk passivly by.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not just that. But what if two anarchists disagree with each other? Who wins? The one who is willing to escalate the highest? My neighbor doesn’t like my native wildflowers, so we yell at each other until someone pulls a gun?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you're both batshit insane, sure.

Of course normal people just have polite conversations.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fortunately for us, everyone on earth has totally rational responses to all situations. And we all agree: we want things to be good, and not bad. And it’s very obvious what things are which!

The thing about the flowers is obviously trivial. There are other matters where a violent ‘direct action’ is obviously warranted.

There are a million things in the middle that are nuanced and difficult and entirely susceptible to ‘person who threatens the most escalation wins’ outcomes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And hierarchies are made up of people who totally have rational responses to all situations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Especially the people who naturally gravitate to the top.

Hence why maintaining a society without any form of explicit or implicit hierarchy is very very possible.