this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
19 points (85.2% liked)

Programming

17547 readers
101 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry, the question in title sounds naive. I have no doubt that math is essential in programming, but I am thinking about philosophy of programming and want to summarize when they're needed in programming. My attempt is below:

Most applications of programming are making electronics do things through their interfaces. Whether that's telling a screen to display something, a network wire to transport data, a hard disk to persist data.

But we often need math because we often transform data, or we might make said electronics do things based on user input, or an event. Transforming an event to data is a mathematical construction.

Some applications are almost purely mathematical, like banking, crypto currency, or encryption.

In your opinion, does this fully explain why we need math in programming? Is there a better way to sum it up?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Formal math can be pretty dang handy, for programmin

But I've never actually needed it, for programming.

Boolean math does sometime look like a super power. I've noticed that veteran programmers pretty much all use it (or an intuition that is essentially the same thing), even if they've never been formally taught.

"I think we can do this in one fewer levels of nesting."

"No way."

.... some time and analysis later...

"How the hell did you know that?!"

"I noticed the logic simplifies a bit with DeMorgan's theorum and still works out."

"What the fuck did you just say?!"

...

"I said it was a lucky guess."