SneerClub

1012 readers

4 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What's the deal with the recent activity on the old subreddit? (awful.systems)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

NSFW 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm seeing two posts from the mods that are sneerworthy content that aren't meta-posts announcing the de-sunsetting of r/sneerclub. I just wanna know what's up.

FWIW, I will stay here and probably won't participate in the subreddit out of laziness.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

it was always a risk; questioning someone's integrity, be it directly or indirectly, is rarely welcomed.

needless to say, i'm even less inclined to resume any activity on reddit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

bonus: some *chan-pilled gobshite thinks this branch is not cool enough (cw: ableism)

It has no reach. Sorry. I myself go there every few weeks to check last threads, but becoming insular autistic circlejrk circlejerking over other autist made it intellectualy impotent, sorry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Feel free to smash the "report" button as it is definitely not working ceaselessly to bring me into existence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

nah, i'm not going back where i'm clearly not wanted; the mods can take care of this themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)