this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
97 points (98.0% liked)

Open Source

31165 readers
96 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Could you explain to me how indeed a desktop reader app for Wikipedia might work better than just, say, opening up Wikipedia in a tab?

Keep in mind that I'm not saying there's no point to it, since the fact that it exists means there is clearly a use case. I'm just wondering what that use case is.

[–] independantiste 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah, 100% of the time I end up on Wikipedia is from clicking a link on google and whatnot, I never actually open Wikipedia then search it with their search thing

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

AFAIK you can do all of the same things in your browser but I find it simpler, neater and faster to have all my Wikipedia tabs and bookmarks in their own application. It's themed for GNOME too and is easy on the eye which is pleasant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That is very fair!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm just wondering what that use case is.

The speed of opening a standalone app instead of opening a browser and searching through bookmarks. Also I think this app is nice to install for someone who's very unfamiliar with computers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Fair enough.

For me, I just set up Wikipedia as one of the search engines, with the search shortcut wiki (you can change this to anything you want) and so typing wiki [keyword] in the address bar will do the same thing as searching site:wikipedia.org [keyword].

No need to mess with bookmarks and I don't have to open up the page (or an app) & then search.

Not sure if you can do this with Chromium-based browsers, but I use a Firefox fork and it's pretty damned easy on it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It could work better because a web browser is the most bloated useless bug ridden insecure creeping horror ever invented.

Although I suspect this is just a web browser with some extra chrome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think it might be because of the extra chrome. Lol. xD

Because, for example, I use LibreWolf with uBlock Origin, NoScript, Decentraleyes, and a small number of other privacy-/security-related extensions and mine seems pretty clean.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The first use-case that came to mind for me is research. A distraction-free dedicated application for wikipedia could be a great way to keep organized, especially if new features are added and expanded upon over time that go beyond the typical browser experience.

It’s not a workflow for everyone and if wikipedia is something that’s usually just accessed through other search engines then this probably won’t be all that useful to you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

That seems reasonable. If it's in a browser tab, you could easily get distracted by other, non-work-related tabs.