Technology

35104 readers

203 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

193

Intel confirms no recall for Raptor Lake CPUs, microcode won’t fix affected units (videocardz.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

So what's the big fuggin' problem here? That Intel won't use the term "recall"?

Would you say the same thing about a car?

"We know the door might fall off but it has not fallen off yet so we are good."

The chances of that door hurting someone are low and yet we still replace all of them because it's the right thing to do.

These processors might fail any minute and you have no way of knowing. There's people who depend on these for work and systems that are running essential services. Even worse, they might fail silently and corrupt something in the process or cause unecessary debugging effort.

If I were running those processors in a company I would expect Intel to replace every single one of them at their cost, before they fail or show signs of failing.

Those things are supposed to be reliable, not a liability.