this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
117 points (99.2% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

755 readers
103 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

No bones about it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Same way if you call something a "wing" it has to be a wing? (I think this should be a thing but since that's not true the boneless part isn't)

Edit: I said that badly, let me rephrase (and this isn't my opinion I'm just trying to decode the logic): Because "Boneless Wing" already isnt technically true to what the product is (it's not a wing), then the other part doesn't have to be technically true (it's not always bonless).

Now if someone sold, a boneless steak with a bone, then under this logic it would not be allowed.