this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
650 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5293 readers
1420 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

neither one has human legs DNA

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Do we know that for certain? Maybe they have the DNA but it isn't the resulting phenotype. I.E. There is nothing preventing two brunettes from having redheaded children.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guess I'm confused what you mean. From ancient Greek mythology "The mythological accounts describe the Minotaur as having the body of a man and the head and tail of a bull."

Minus the trail the legs should essentially be human, no? But if we go into DNA then neither have any human DNA right? Since they're their own species and should have their own DNA.

[–] JamesStallion 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The.minotaur often gets shown with hoofs (hooves?) and furry legs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I think that's other fantasy settings making their own interpretation, but the original minotaur from my understanding had human legs and feet.