this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
146 points (98.0% liked)

Legal News

191 readers
13 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge pushed enactment of law to display religious code until November in response to parents’ suit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck your cult!

Separation of church and state, remember?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with the sentiment. However the separation of church and state isn't really a legal standard. It comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson.

We have the 1A which prohibits the establishment of state religions (which this probably violates).

But if they choose to put a holy book from each religion in every school library that'd likely be upheld.

Tldr: the government can't pick favorites w/ religion but it doesn't have pretend they don't exist legally.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Want a christofashist dictatorship? Cause that’s how America gets one.

Freedom of religion means freedom FROM religion too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

My statement wasn't one of policy but of law. If it were up to me I'd take "in god we trust" off the dollar.

In the 1780s they were concerned with the government establishing a state religion that wasn't theirs. I would absolutely support more stringent regulation on the government favoring the broad concept of religion. But unfortunately I'm afraid as a matter of law the 1A isn't as robust on that matter as I think it aught to be.