this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
90 points (93.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40445 readers
428 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
90
Anytype has open sourced all their repos! Self hosting now possible! (github.com)
submitted 1 year ago by MonkCanatella to c/[email protected]
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/1386745

Anytype has finally followed through on their promise and open sourced their repositories. Self hosting is now possible though there is no docker container available.

This is a major step forward for all PKMS and I wholeheartedly congratulate them.

btw Anytype is free, even their included sync service, which is the best of any offline-first style PKMS I have experienced. Anytype is top 3 PKMS for me, followed by Logseq and SiYuan. They're in good company and now it's only going to improve!

Resources:

Self hosting documentation

Contributor discussions

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It looks interesting as an app, but in context of self-hosting there are couple of speed bumps:

  • The server side is quite complicated. (compared to Joplin for example) It's multiple services and it also needs Mongo, Redis and S3. Makes sense for them to do it this way to be able to scale up, but for few users hosted locally it's quite a lot of moving parts.
  • You need to compile client apps to self-host. This effectively kills this as an option on iOS.
[–] MonkCanatella 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oof yeah if you can't use their app store client with a selfhosted instance then that's a major barrier. You'd have to use xcode to build and sideload it, so yeah effectively killing ios. I think that'll come up in the self hosting discussion as that's a pretty major omission. I assume that will be easy enough to remedy in the near future

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

To be fair, the onboarding experience in the app is impressively good. It's extremely straightforward with no unnecessary buttons or steps. So I kind of see why they might be hesitant to add complexity by supporting self-hosted backend as an option.