this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
406 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

4852 readers
1608 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Also it’s interesting that NDT orients his EM spectrum by wavelength rather than frequency, such that “above red” and “below UV” falls outside the visible range. Is ascending wavelength the convention in astrophysics?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I imagine that he is equating the spectrum back to the rainbow, where red is the 'top' of the visible arch when a single rainbow is seen from the ground.

Of course the outer ring from a double rainbow flips the order of the colours, but that's probably being needlessly pedantic.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Oh shit, I hadn’t thought of that! That would be more accessible to the uninitiated, which is his thing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not normally. In physics the general convention is to use photon energy. This puts Radio and IR 'below' red, and UV 'above'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That makes sense. Might’ve just been an accidental swap. Tweets aren’t peer reviewed.