this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
205 points (98.1% liked)

movies

1390 readers
279 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The manslaughter trial against Alec Baldwin over the fatal shooting of Rust cinematographer Halyna Hutchins has been dismissed. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer threw out the case over how police and prosecutors treated a handful of bullets, which they failed to turn over to the defence.

“The state is highly culpable for its failure to provide discovery to the defendant,” Judge Sommer said. “Dismissal with prejudice is warranted.” The dismissal came as a surprise as gasps were said to be heard in the courtroom and Baldwin was congratulated by his family and supporters.

More to come…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (25 children)

Which has nothing to do with this decision. This what about due process by the police, nothing to do with actual fault.

As producer he should still hold the final culpability of anyone and anything on site. It would be like letting the owner of a company walk on a technicality, he’s still responsible in the end.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

As producer he should still hold the final culpability of anyone and anything on site. It would be like letting the owner of a company walk on a technicality, he’s still responsible in the end.

What you're describing would be civil liability, not criminal. It would potentially be criminal if a supervisor knew one of their direct reports was doing something illegal and condoned it or did nothing, but that doesn't seem to be the case here

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

In Canada it would be criminal and not civil.

It comes down to who has direct authority over someone though iirc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I bet Canada's putting a ton of CEOs in jail, right?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The link actually includes everyone who has been charged under the bill if you read it!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So no CEOs in jail, because the only penalty from a criminal conviction under this statute is a fine

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)