this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
554 points (95.7% liked)

US Authoritarianism

673 readers
135 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Fact Check

Based on currently available numbers, there are about 31 vacant housing units for every homeless person in the U.S.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

On a more serious note i wonder why you think people that are currently unhoused couldn't take public transit?

Do you ever have any ideas? What's it like not being able to reason?

[–] dream_weasel 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Watch out! Goal posts are moving boys!

This is not "house then where they are". This is the sane argument of put housing and move the people, not "There's no housing so I cast SOciALisM!" And poof it's solved.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

local man disproves leftist theory on technicality by taking online argument extremely literally!

[–] dream_weasel 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. We don't need to move people around, build houses where people need houses!

  2. No not like that. Obviously build them somewhere else and bus people to the houses!

Internet idea man is oblivious to cognitive dissonance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Editing to be less rude because I think there's actually a real misunderstanding here.

Build houses in places (cities, not literal square meters) where unhoused people need to be housed. They, like anyone else that lives in a city, can use their feet and bikes and public transit to go from where their house is to another place in that city where maybe they shop and work like any other citizen. The suggestion is simply to give them houses.

I also disagree with suburban sprawl and NIMBYism, hence my comments about densification

[–] dream_weasel 2 points 1 month ago

We are on the same page. Where I see homelessness there is not space for housing, but there are places that could accommodate without a cross-country trek.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)