this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
1546 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

5303 readers
1603 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (16 children)

That seems like an Utopian view you're not paying for the knowledge but for the resources to learn and accreditation. Universities, professors, etc don't pay for themselves. Even when University is "free" you are paying it through taxes - which is still fine by me.

I don't agree, though, with the prices practiced in the US, that's just a way of restraining the population. Where I'm from, going to college is not expensive, I cannot fathom having to pay those ridiculous prices.

[–] freeman 14 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Paying via taxes is not charging students.

You do not pay taxes based on your use of public education or use of any other public service but based on your income and/or wealth.

If you do not make sufficient income as a student to pay taxes or enough taxes to cover the cost of your education your public education is in fact free to you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

What I meant is someone has to pay for it, it's not free lunch. You're right that the students don't pay it through taxes, but someone has to. Myself as a working person do pay for others through taxes

Edit: as people seem to have failed to see my point: I'm glad my taxes help pay for other's studies

[–] freeman 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think OP is not aware that there are costs to be paid but merely disagrees with using sports as a way to pay for it?

You even used the word Utopian. Well most universities are not financed via sports even non public ones. Far from Utopian.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

A society which charges students to acquire knowledge values neither.

Because this is literally what he said. He never mentioned sports, just charging in general.

I understand his sentiment, but it's not practical.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Charging students ≠ paying for the education through taxation as a public good

It must be practical as it is the normal way university works in much of the industrial world

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Yes yes go read my other comments.

[–] freeman 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is practical; Wholely tax funded universities do not charge students.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes I think we both agree with that. It was a misinterpretation on my part of OP arguments: no charging at all vs charging students

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)