Gaming

2762 readers

1363 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.

2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.

I should not need to explain this one.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.

Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

935

Peak graphic design (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, for one, its relationship to "Gaming" is tenuous, at best

I agree it would potentially be better in a mildly interesting or a graphics design based community. But it is related to gaming, even if tenuously.

There's nothing even remotely conversation worthy here. "Look at this neat design." Okay, and? What is the expected or desired response to that?

And yet multiple people have managed to make responses. Discussing the design in relation to other Nintendo designs etc.

Just because you couldn't think of something to add to the conversation doesn't mean others couldn't.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

And yet multiple people have managed to make responses.

Yes, and their responses are either equally vapid or are things like "Wait until they hear about the FedEx logo." My initial response was critical of the underlying nature of the post, and I would argue that this conversation we are having right now, is substantially better than any conversation being had about the logo itself. So I guess I did have something to add to the conversation, otherwise (wait for it) you wouldn't have bothered responding to me. Would you?