92
US Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private acts
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
92 points (96.9% liked)
United States | News & Politics
1638 readers
76 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
He can be charged for private acts, but as long as he used official communication to discuss it with others that can't be used as evidence. Then the stacked courts get to decide what is official and private, so private is effectively immune as well.
What a fucking shitshow.
Anything that can be used to show anything is an official act.
There is no difference. There never will be. Everything is official and anyone can be killed to prove it such, officially.
Immunity doesn’t need to be proven, it exists and it’s up to you to prove otherwise. Fuck off until proven otherwise.
It’s not a bad thing. Unless you can officially prove it. So fuck you, you piece of shit; until you can prove it.