this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
42 points (71.0% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3232 readers
17 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://lemmy.world/c/christians

This community does not affirm practiced LGBTQ+ lifestyles

Rule 8 of this community is in clear breach of the first goal from the lemmy/mastodon.world code of conduct

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (32 children)

To play devil's advocate (pun not intended), this community poses an interesting quandary.

When seen in context, their rules do clearly prohibit any hate speech against the LGBTQ+ community:

Rule #5: Remember that we are all fellow image-bearers. We may disagree with people, but we are never to tear down another person’s inherent dignity and value as someone made in the image of God (Imago Dei). This includes those in the LGBTQ+ community. They need Jesus, too, just like we do, and we can’t say we represent Him while we tear down the works of His hands.

Rule #6: Banned subjects include ... Anything calling for direct/indirect violence against any individual or group, including LGBTQ+ individuals or groups; ...

Rule #8: This community does not affirm practiced LGBTQ+ lifestyles, with the exception of the ace/aroace (asexual/aromatic-asexual) lifestyle in certain contexts. However, abuse towards members of the LGBTQ+ community will not be tolerated. Pro-LGBTQ+ content is not allowed; however, sincere questions and discourse about LGTBQ+issues are permitted.

I'd be interested to see the admin's ruling in this case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I was going to say something pretty similar to what you were.

I'm the last one to generally defend religious people, but are they actually being bigoted?

There's a pretty large difference between not affirming something and attacking something and frankly flipping through the community I didn't see either of those things occurring.

It sounds like the original poster just doesn't like the rule itself.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Pro-LGBTQ+ content is not allowed

That sounds pretty intolerant to me. How else do you define a bigot?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd say that sounds more like a circlejerk than intolerance but that sounds pretty gay so is probably not allowed there either.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Those things often go hand in hand

[–] yata 4 points 1 year ago

An intolerant circlejerk.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)