this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
375 points (96.5% liked)

Data is Beautiful

852 readers
231 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's interesting. I wonder whether those 6519 surveyed are representative of whole population, or of people who anyway online a lot. It’s seems there was an inflection around 2012 - what happened then ? The curve ends during covid lockdowns, wonder whether deflected since ?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

There was an almost overnight shift from "ewww, online people are weird strangers" to "the Internet is just digital real life". For years it was the first, and then as mainstream popularity hit, it was like a switch flipped and suddenly the Internet was "cool" and just like comics and superheros, everyone acted like they were a fan all along.

It was kinda jarring tbh. All the things that got you labeled a nerd and a geek(negatively) were suddenly good things. I think it mostly had to do with the tech surge and people seeing it as a valuable thing now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Tinder launches in 2012.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Based on the one class I took in college about surveys and mass comm I’d say that’s a good sample size (assuming they were chosen at random). Most political polls survey about 1500 people with 90%+ accuracy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But how, practically, do you choose any sample "at random" nowadays ?
Especially if trying to avoid a bias towards (or away from) online people ?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Great question! Back in the day we would pick names at random in the phone book so my info is pretty outdated