this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
1200 points (95.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
57 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    Unfortunately the free version on Linux doesn't support H.264/H.265 and even the paid version doesn't support AAC so using Resolve requires you to transcode if you're using any normal consumer camera.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    doesn't support AAC

    Use OPUS. Better and free.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The point was probably that if your equipment or sources use aac, you will need to transcode it, losing quality in the process. We don't always control our media sources and the formats they use.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    That's it exactly. Most consumer camera gear uses H.264/H.265 for video and AAC for audio in an MP4 container and the free version of Davinci Resolve just doesn't support that on Linux. (But does on Windows)

    [–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

    If it even doesn't support import and export in those formats, you can try externally decode audio and video and store in lossless format. FLAC for audio and something like FFV1 for video.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    Since you are cutting video in pieces, applying filters and all the fun stuff, you are transcoding it anyway.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    Yes, but then you would be transcoding an already transcoded video, potentially making the losses apparent. It would be better to just transcode once at the exporting process.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

    It would be better to just transcode once at the exporting process.

    Lossy encoding only happens once in both cases.

    How direct import-export works: input file -> lossy format decompressor of editor -> filters -> lossy format compressor of editor -> output

    How external codecs work: input -> external lossy format decompressor -> intermediate representation(lossless codec, can be just storing raw frames) -> IR decoder of editor -> filters -> IR encoder of editor -> external lossy format compressor -> output

    Both options have only one lossy step - lossy encoder. Or technically two - also filters, but this is editor's intention.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

    Oh, I get it now, you mean using a lossless format as intermediate. Well, it would work but still it would be better if they didn't require this extra work on linux.