this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
326 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

59622 readers
2877 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
326
What is Cara, the Instagram alternative that gained 600k users in a week? (www.creativebloq.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Key points:

  • Cara's Rapid Growth: The app gained 600,000 users in a week

  • Artists Leaving Instagram: The controversy around Instagram using images to train AI led many artists to seek an alternative

  • Cara's Features: The app is designed specifically for artists and offers a 'Portfolio' feature. Users can tag fields, mediums, project types, categories, and software used to create their work

  • While Cara has grown quickly, it is still tiny compared to Instagram's massive user base of two billion.

  • Glaze Integration: Cara is working on integrating Glaze directly in the app to provide users with an easy way to protect their work from be used by any AI

more about: https://blog.cara.app/blog/cara-glaze-about

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why are you twisting it to make it seem like Cara is doing a good thing? What's your motive? What is the difference between Cara owning it by default and the uploader owning it by default? Why can't it just be the owners property?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because "anonymous" isn't necessarily a person who can answer for copyright. They literally gave you a use case where it could help in the content you're arguing against...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What has this got to do with who owns the copyright? And why is anonymous uploading allowed anyway?